When to engage
When decision ownership, approval pathways or governance controls are unclear or ineffective, leading to delays, rework, unnecessary escalation or increased governance risk during operational change, capital delivery or complex program environments.
Decision Governance Framework Review
Clarify decision rights, approval pathways and accountability
PROGRAM AND INTEGRATION RISK
Engagement structure
Project-based independent review and redesign of decision governance. The engagement clarifies decision authority, approval pathways, oversight mechanisms and control requirements, enabling efficient decisions with clear accountability.
Trigger conditions
- Decisions are repeatedly delayed, contested or escalated
- Accountability for approvals is unclear across functions or sites
- Governance forums have become bottlenecks rather than control enablers
- Approvals are inconsistent, slow, or difficult to defend under scrutiny
- An incident, audit finding, or organisational restructure has exposed weaknesses in decision control
Our approach
Review current governance structures
Assess decision authorities, approval processes and organisational accountability
Identify governance gaps and overlaps
→
Review → Identify → Evaluate → Strengthen
Highlight unclear decision rights, duplicated authority or missing oversight
Evaluate cross-functional alignment
→
Assess coordination between operations, engineering, finance and executive leadership
Strengthen decision governance frameworks
→
Recommend improvements to support clearer, faster and more defensible decisions
Key deliverables
-
Decision governance framework report, executive-ready
-
Decision rights and delegations map
-
Approval pathway and escalation model
-
Governance forum structure and terms of reference pack
-
Decision control and reporting pack, templates and standards
-
Implementation roadmap for adoption and changeover
Business outcomes
-
Clear decision rights and unambiguous accountability
-
Reduced decision delay, rework and unnecessary escalation
-
Faster approval of major capital and operational decisions while maintaining governance defensibility
-
Governance forums that enable timely capital and operational decisions rather than delaying delivery
-
Stronger protection of high-value capital and operational decisions through consistent governance and risk oversight
Independent and objective
AGC delivers impartial assessment of decision rights, approval pathways and governance effectiveness. Recommendations are developed independently of organisational politics, functional ownership or legacy structures, ensuring governance frameworks are practical and defensible.